ORIGIN of the SOLAR SYSTEM

All the hypotheses (even so-called fission theory) accept that the planets have formed one by one. The facts show that the planets have formed two by two.

My hypothesis has the advantage of being testable. In 2012 NASA's MESSENGER spacecraft will gather data about the surface composition of Mercury. If these data show a common origin of Mercury and the Moon, most probably my hypothesis is right.

Chapter 1 “Relic Phenomena”. In astronomy atlases, everyone can notice that the planets are grouped in couples of similar sizes: Jupiter and Saturn, Uranus and Neptune, Pluto and Charon, Venus and the Earth. This fact could be explained in just one way: the planets have formed by couples of proto-planet clouds. As a working model I use the magnetosphere of the Earth scheme. Note that one of the protoplanet clouds in the couple is slightly bigger than the other. The same can be observed today with the sizes of the planets.

Chapter 3. “Snowball” The formation of the planets of a gas-and-dust nebula resembles a lot the snow-men game. However, kids make snowballs with hands while the nebular hypothesis explains the consolidating of the planets with work. My model specifies the nebular hypothesis. Grouped in couples around Lagrangian points the protoplanet clouds have a bigger chance to form planets. Even more my model explains a lot of other problems. First, why Venus, Uranus and Pluto have a retrograde spin? If the planets have formed one by one the mystery could be explained by accidental events. If the planets have formed in couples the mystery could be explained quite simply. One protoplanet turns left and the other right (the same explanation was already used for proto-galaxies).


Chapter 4. “Quantization” The protoplanet clouds are quantized around Lagrangian points L1 and L2 in three separate phases. Instead of 9 we have 12 planets (See the table 4.1). Let us imagine these 12 protoplanet cores and gas-and-dust envelopes of approximately the same size. Why is there such a big difference today between the couples in sizes and density? An answer to that question and not only to it gives the next chapter.

 

Chapter 5. “Planetary Inbreeding” The law of distribution of the planetary orbits contains the 2ⁿ article, where (n) is natural number. Everyone of us has 2ⁿ ancestors n-generations back in time. Modern science considers that everything in the Universe changes. Today the center of the planet system is Jupiter. 4,6 billion years ago the center of the proto-planet disc probably was the Kuiper belt. Nowadays astronomers discover new bodies there as some of them are binary systems. The already formed planets fish out of their gas-and-dust envelopes and their quite elongated orbits gradually shorten till almost circular. That explains why around terrestrial planets there are no gases and dust. Jovian planets were attracted the gas-and-dust envelopes of terrestrial planets. Thus the equal quantization of proto-planet disc becomes today's unequal distribution of masses and density. The same can explain the satellite systems around Jovian planets as well as the rings around them. This assumption explains why Jovian planets' satellites have bigger density than the planets themselves. By the way Jovian planets' satellites are also grouped in couples of similar size and density (see the table 5.1).

 

Chapter 6. “The Moon” The most unique idea of my book is that the Moon formed a couple with Mercury and just subsequently it was trapped by the Earth. Mercury and the Moon are similar in size. There is a big resemblance between the surfaces of the two planets. Mercury has a big iron core and the Moon doesn't. The heavy elements in the protoplanet couple have “poured” into proto-Mercury. This model, like binary stars, suggests a mass exchange between the protoplanet clouds. The same mechanism is used for the explanation of why some planets have magnetic field and some don't.

Chapter 7. “Physics and Biology” If all the planets have formed two by two, this will be the “missing link” in the cosmic evolution. On the one hand we have pairs of fundamental particles, double black holes, double galaxies and binary stars. On the other hand there is the dipole of water molecule, bilateral carbon atom, bilayered membranes, double helix of DNA, division of the cell, two sexes.

Chapter 8. “The Water” As in the other chapters, we will review two main problems here as well. First, the dipole of water molecule determines the most significant qualities of the biological solvent. Second, the Ice Ages. If we go back to Chapter 5 we will see that the Earth was not born here but where now the ice satellites of giant planets are. Besides, all the planets and satellites with rigid surface show a bilateral asymmetry. That fact in connection to all the others could be explained in just one way.

Chapter 9. “Hypotheses” A historic retrospection of the different hypotheses for the origin of the Solar System.

Chapter 10. “The Light” A description of processes running in the Sun.

Chapter 11. “LGM” Origin of life and little green men

Chapter 12. “Philosophy” The idea of my book is that all major processes in the Solar System were settled within the protoplanet couples. In that last chapter I describe analogies (just analogies, nothing more) with history. In human history there were many countries but just a few countries-doubles set historical tendencies: Sumer and Akkad, Assyria and Babylonia, Sparta and Athens, Rome and Carthago, Eastern and Western Roman Empire, USA and USSR, etc.
This chapter contains two special sentences. The idea of this book has analogies with the Gospel: the selection of the apostles two by two and the formation of the planets two by two, 12 apostles, one of which a traitor, 12 planets, one of which an unrealized (asteroids).

* (This paragraph is not a part of the book)  I'm tired of repeating: The capture of the Moon is very unlikely to happen, if the planets are formed one by one. If the planets are formed two by two, the situation is quite different.

Amazon-Book

E-book in PDF Pay with PayPal